Updated: Dec 21, 2020
From 2016, the Gambling Commission and the Advisory Board for Safer Gambling (RGSB), have consistently reiterated the need for a public health approach to gambling-harm through the "National Responsible Gambling Strategy" and the "National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms".
What is the public health approach?
A public health approach aims to achieve the best health outcomes for the whole population. It does not just focus on those who are most severely affected and instead aims to reduce the overall burden of disease.
The first step of a public health approach is to define the problem:
Who is affected?
How big is the problem? (burden of disease)
What contributes to the problem?
When and where the problem is most likely to occur?
In the last 30 years, Disability-Adjusted Life Years have been used widely to measure burden of disease on a population-level. Globally, there have only ever been two published attempts to measure the gambling-harm burden of disease (Australia 2016 & New Zealand 2017).
World Health Organisation - WHO:
"Burden of disease is concept that was developed in the 1990s by the Harvard School of Public Health, the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO) to describe death and loss of health due to diseases, injuries and risk factors for all regions of the world.
The burden of a particular disease or condition is estimated by adding together:
the number of years of life a person loses as a consequence of dying early because of the disease (called YLL, or Years of Life Lost); and
the number of years of life a person lives with disability caused by the disease (called YLD, or Years of Life lived with Disability).
Adding together the Years of Life Lost and Years of Life lived with Disability gives a single-figure estimate of disease burden, called the Disability Adjusted Life Year (or DALY). One DALY represents the loss of one year of life lived in full health."
Prioritising actions in health and the environment
Planning for preventive action
Assessing performance of healthcare systems
Comparing action and health gain
Identifying high-risk populations
Planning for future needs
Setting priorities in health research
What is the gambling-related burden of harm?
New Zealand, 2017 (Adult population = 3.6m)
Years of disability due to gambling-harm = 0.16m
67, 199 years due to harms from own gambling in adults (prevalence: 7.3%)
94, 730 years due to harms from someone else's gambling in adults (prevalence: 13.6%)
Alcohol - Hazardous drinking (>8 AUDIT): 87, 620 years (prevalence: 22.3%)
Anxiety and depressive disorders: 106, 280 years (prevalence: 17.4%)
Drug use disorders: 22, 396 years (prevalence: 1.9%)
Other DALYs in New Zealand for context
Total number of DALYs in New Zealand 2013 (gambling-harm omitted) = 1.10m (0.57m (52%) due to YLD + 0.53m (48%) due to YLL)
Dietary risk was the leading risk factor in 2006, accounting for 11.4% of health loss (0.11m DALYs)
Tobacco use was the second leading risk factor in 2006, accounting for 9.1% of health loss (0.09m DALYs).
Victoria, Australia 2016 (Adult population, 4.4m)
Years of disability due to gambling-harm = 0.12m
101, 675 years due to harms from own gambling in adults (prevalence: 12.5%)
16, 320 years due to harms from someone else's gambling in adults (prevalence: 2.8%)
Alcohol use and dependence: 142, 262 years (prevalence: 25.0%)
Major depressive disorder: 142, 451 years (prevalence: 6.6%)
Cannabis dependence: 16, 906 years (prevalence: 0.4%)
Other DALYs in Victoria Australia for context
Total number of DALYs in Victoria Australia 2015 (gambling-harm omitted) = 1.2m years
In 2015, tobacco use accounted for 8.6% of health loss (0.10m DALYs)
In 2010, alcohol use accounted for 3.4% of health loss (0.04m DALYs)
Great Britain, 2020 (Adult population = 53.6m)
Years of disability due to gambling-harm = 2.04m (using Disability Weights estimates from New Zealand and Australia populations)
Years of life lost due to gambling-harm = 0.05m+ (using standardised mortality ratios from a longitudinal study in Sweden)
1.10m years due to harms from own gambling in adults (prevalence: 8.5%)
0.94m years due to harms from someone else's gambling in adults (prevalence: 6%)
0.05m years due to mortality in individuals with gambling disorder aged 20-50
Other DALYs in England for context
Total number of DALYs in England 2013 = 13.7m (gambling-harm omitted, Adult population = 43.7m)
Gambling-harm in adults: 1.71m (12.5%)
Dietary risks: 1.47m (10.8%)
Tobacco smoke: 1.46m (10.7%)
Gambling-harm in adult gamblers: 0.94m (6.9%)
Gambling-harm in adult affected others: 0.77m (5.6%)
Alcohol use: 0.55m (4.0%) including Alcohol use disorders: 0.09m (0.7%)
Drug use: 0.27m (2.0%)
Years of life lost due to mortality in gamblers (<20 and 50+) and affected others
Legacy-harm in former gamblers and former affected others
There is early evidence that illustrates that gambling-harm is attributable to more harm to health than any other risk factor in New Zealand and Great Britain
The results from Victoria Australia provide a less clear picture, as estimates of harm from alcohol-use varies by study design; however, gambling-harm in adults would still be one of the leading risk-factors for overall harm to health
Gambling-harm is expected to be an even more significant factor when evaluating harm to health in individuals aged <50 years old and especially when evaluating harm to health via disability separately (quality of life)
Research, Education, and Treatment (RET) in the UK should look to define gambling-harm in the public health context, through measurements of burden of disease, and these measurements should look to consider harms in under 16 year olds, legacy harms, and loss of life due to mortality